Servant leadership in diverse contexts essay

SERVANT LEADERSHIP IN DIVERSE CONTEXTS ESSAY SERIES

( 2008) further stressed the fundamental leadership behaviours of servant leadership, such as behaving ethically, helping followers grow and succeed, empowering, emotional healing, conceptual skills and creating value for the community. The emphasis of the servant leadership philosophy has been placed over time on serving and creating value for multiple stakeholders, both internal and external to the organization. GreenleafвЂ™s conception was then refined by many other scholars, such as Ehrhart ( 2004), who claimed that servant leadership is one in which the leader goes beyond the financial success of the organization recognizing his or her moral responsibility towards subordinates, customers and the entire companyвЂ™s community. The author asserted that the servant leader is вЂњprimus inter paresвЂќ or вЂњfirst among equalsвЂќ, meaning that his/her highest priority is service to others in order to fulfill their needs, rather than fulfilling his or her personal needs. In particular, the term servant leadership was coined by Greenleaf in 1970 in his essay вЂњThe Servant as Leader' to describe an emerging style of leadership where leaders focused on followersвЂ™ personal growth and development, by treating them in an ethical way.

Like most other leadership constructs, the definition and measurement of servant leadership were primarily developed in the United States. Servant leadership seems to be the most promising and most investigated over the last few years, especially due to the holistic approach and broad focus adopted compared to the other philosophies, as well as to its important role in affecting individual and team-level outcomes, such as organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behaviour, job performance and job satisfaction. As a consequence, moral leadership theories, such as transformational, ethical, authentic and servant leadership, have recently received considerable attention from the scientific community. With the beginning of the twenty-first century, the moral nature of leaders has started to be considered not only necessary for the good of society but also essential for sustainable organizational success (Freeman et al., 2004 Gulati et al., 2010 Padilla et al., 2007), thus marking a considerable shift in research. A dynamic methodology called вЂњSystematic Literature Network AnalysisвЂќ has been applied, combining the Systematic Literature Review approach with the analysis of bibliographic networks. The purpose of this paper is to depict the evolution of the scientific literature that has developed on the concept, to identify the main criticalities and provide avenues for future research.

In particular, the latest trend in literature has focused on the identification of the antecedents, mediating and moderating mechanisms at the basis of this relationship, as well as on the development of a common scale to measure the construct across diverse economic and cultural contexts.

SERVANT LEADERSHIP IN DIVERSE CONTEXTS ESSAY SERIES

Although the concept is not new among both academics and practitioners, it has received growing consideration in the last decade, due to the fact that it can positively affect a series of individual and organizational outcomes, such as job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Servant leadership is a form of moral-based leadership where leaders tend to prioritize the fulfillment of the needs of followers, namely employees, customers and other stakeholders, rather than satisfying their personal needs.

Servant leadership in diverse contexts essay